🔗 Share this article

Tehran is willing to resume atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Tehran's top diplomat has announced.

The Iranian diplomat said exclusively dialogue produced results, and disclosed recent overtures had come from mediators to restart negotiations with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Iran had not yet reached a point to authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit attacked atomic facilities for protective measures.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a challenging course since Iran aims to avoid appear to be acting from a situation of disadvantage, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reaffirmed that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Terminated

The earlier sessions of talks between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with US support, struck Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the American leader declaring the locations had been destroyed. Following this, European countries exercised their privilege to reimpose international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with US participation could enrich uranium. Each party would have been able to declare success since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the talks that US nuclear scientists could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Officials stated on multiple occasions they had secured an understanding with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Current Situation

Iran's diplomats declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems quite possible the offer could be reintroduced in various formats if talks resume.

Trump in recent days claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but in private Iranian officials say they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either straightforwardly or from key regional mediators, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been charged of non-responsiveness in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts dialogue is not part of a spectacle.

Political Stance

In his speech to the forum, intended to portray the US as a hegemonic power that misuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister declared the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the conflict could not be resolved by armed force. He stated the attacks started with a American requirement for an complete Tehran capitulation and concluded with an complete request for a ceasefire.

Iran is assured the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with complete American awareness and cooperation, making trust challenging to restore.

Negotiations Continues the Primary Resolution

Araghchi declared: "It was not Iran that had abandoned diplomacy; it was the United States and the Western nations that had repeatedly tried to impose their will during the discussions. Dialogue can still be active and continues the ultimate solution to resolve disagreements, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"If they address to the citizens of Tehran with the tone of dignity and honor, they will obtain a reply in the equivalent language."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We learned numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He added: "We managed to survive this war. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to destroy, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be restored; what is essential is the resolve of the citizens of Tehran and then the unity of the country that they sought to undermine, but failed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more united, and more backing of the government and the nation in the aftermath of this assault."